Northern Ireland
·
Case
·
KB
·
Score 5
The High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland considered Michael Gallagher’s application for leave to seek judicial review of Lord Turnbull’s 17 November 2025 ruling on whether special advocates could be appointed to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry. The judgment frames the dispute around whether the Inquiries Act 2005 permits special advocates and, if not, whether their absence would prevent the Inquiry from meeting article 2 ECHR procedural fairness requirements.
- Applicant: Michael Gallagher; challenge to a ruling by Lord Turnbull, chair of the Omagh Bombing Inquiry
- Issue: whether the Inquiries Act 2005 allows appointment of special advocates for closed material in the Inquiry
- Reasoning: the court treats the Inquiry as an inquisitorial, not adversarial, statutory process focused on fact-finding and truth recovery
Why it matters
The case matters for national-security and legacy-inquiry practice because it addresses how closed material is handled in an inquiry into a terrorist atrocity and whether procedural safeguards must mirror adversarial litigation. That can affect how sensitive intelligence and security material is presented in future public-law processes.
case-law
judicial-review
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
UKUT
·
Score 3
The Upper Tribunal heard an appeal by Simon and Iva Fletcher against Portsmouth City Council over the appropriateness of HMO licence conditions imposed at 1 Sheffield Road, Portsmouth, and considered six grounds challenging those conditions. It reviewed the statutory framework under the Housing Act 2004, the First-tier Tribunal’s approach, and the Council’s use of standard form conditions applied across Portsmouth.
- Parties: Simon and Iva Fletcher v Portsmouth City Council; dispute concerned HMO licence conditions for 1 Sheffield Road, Portsmouth.
- Issue: whether the licence conditions were appropriate under section 67 of the Housing Act 2004, including the relationship with mandatory conditions in Schedule 4.
- The Tribunal set out the appeal approach from Hussain: the FTT must decide whether the licensing decision was wrong at the time, giving the authority due deference.
Why it matters
This is primarily a housing-regulation decision, not a sanctions or export-control case, so its direct geopolitical relevance is limited. Its significance for sovereign-risk or enforcement analysis lies in how the Tribunal frames local authority licensing discretion, especially where standardised conditions are imposed across a jurisdiction.
case-law
senior-court
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
UKSC
·
Score 3
This Supreme Court judgment concerns the interpretation of the salaried members legislation in the Finance Act 2014 and whether certain members of BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP should be treated as employees rather than partners for income tax and NICs purposes. HMRC had made PAYE and Class 1 NIC determinations for tax years 2014 to 2019, and the appeal turns on Conditions A and B, with Condition C accepted to be met by all individual members.
- Parties: Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs v BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP.
- Issue: construction and application of the salaried members rules in ITTOIA 2005, sections 863A to 863G, as inserted by the Finance Act 2014.
- Context: HMRC treated all but four BlueCrest members as meeting the salaried members conditions and issued PAYE and NICs determinations of about £142m and £55.3m respectively.
Why it matters
For sanctions and geopolitical-risk audiences, the case matters because it shows how UK courts approach statutory tests that allocate tax and payroll liabilities at scale, which can affect group structuring, personnel classification, and enforcement exposure. It does not address sanctions directly, but it is relevant to compliance planning where legal form, control, and remuneration arrangements are scrutinized by regulators.
case-law
senior-court
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (Health Education and Social Care Chamber)
case-law
EU
·
Case
·
Score 1
From European Court of Human Rights
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (Tax)
case-law
Northern Ireland
·
Case
·
Score 1
From High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland Chancery Division Decisions
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Northern Ireland
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Northern Ireland - Social Security and Child Support Commissioners' Decisions
case-law
EU
·
Case
·
Score 1
From European Court of Human Rights
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Scotland
·
Case
·
CSOH
·
Score 1
From Scottish Court of Session Decisions
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (Tax)
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (Tax)
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
EAT
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (Tax)
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
EU
·
Case
·
Score 1
From European Court of Human Rights
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
EAT
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
case-law
EU
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (Tax)
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (Tax)
case-law
Northern Ireland
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Northern Ireland - Social Security and Child Support Commissioners' Decisions
case-law
Scotland
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Scottish Sheriff Court Decisions
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IECA
·
Score 1
From Irish Court of Appeal
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IECA
·
Score 1
From Irish Court of Appeal
case-law
Jersey
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Jersey Unreported Judgments
case-law
Jersey
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Jersey Unreported Judgments
case-law