Scotland
·
Case
·
CSOH
·
Score 5
The petition challenged a Faculty of Advocates disciplinary outcome: Andrew Smith KC sought judicial review of the Disciplinary Tribunal’s 18 July 2025 decision, which had largely upheld Complaints Committee findings of professional misconduct and the severe written censure imposed on him. The opinion set out the background, the complaint history, and the issues for determination, including jurisdiction, alleged irrationality, Article 6 delay, and the competency of the remedies sought.
- Petitioner: Andrew Smith KC; respondent: Faculty of Advocates, reviewing a disciplinary process arising from complaints by Steven Elliott.
- The underlying complaints concerned alleged conflict of interest and alleged improper direct contact with a trustee in bankruptcy; the Complaints Committee upheld complaints 5 and 10 and imposed a severe written censure.
- The Disciplinary Tribunal upheld the appeal only on complaint 14 and otherwise left the merits and sanction unaltered.
Why it matters
The case is relevant to sanctions/intelligence audiences mainly as a procedural signal: it shows how a professional-regulation body’s disciplinary decisions can be tested through judicial review, including on delay and appellate scope. It has no direct sanctions or export-control content, but it illustrates litigation risk around institutional decision-making and procedural fairness.
case-law
judicial-review
Northern Ireland
·
Case
·
NICA
·
Score 5
The judgment is an appeal in judicial review proceedings brought by two minor pupils, acting by their parents, against the refusal of leave to challenge decisions not to approve proposals for their schools to transform to controlled integrated status. The Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland set out the statutory and policy framework governing integrated education, including the 1989 Order as amended by the 2022 Act, and explained the statutory process for transformation proposals and ministerial approval.
- Applicants/Appellants: JR335 and JR336, minor pupils acting by parent/next friend; proposed respondents: the Minister and the Department of Education; interested party: the Education Authority.
- Challenge arose from refusal of leave to seek judicial review of decisions not to approve two school transformation proposals to integrated status.
- Court focused on the interaction between Article 64(1) of the 1989 Order, as amended to require the Department to “encourage, facilitate and support” integrated education, and Article 92(6), which bars approval unless the school would be likely to provide integrated education.
Why it matters
This is relevant to sovereign-risk and public-law monitoring because it shows how Northern Ireland’s education authorities and Minister must balance a statutory duty to support integrated education with the specific legal threshold for approving school conversion. It is not a sanctions case, but it is useful for tracking how courts frame mandatory duties, administrative discretion, and challengeable refusal decisions.
case-law
judicial-review
Jersey
·
Case
·
Score 5
From Jersey Unreported Judgments
case-law
judicial-review
Northern Ireland
·
Case
·
NICA
·
Score 5
The Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland dismissed Mr Duff’s appeal for leave to apply for judicial review against a decision of Lisburn and Castlereagh City Council. It agreed with the lower court that leave had been correctly refused on the grounds advanced, and it also examined standing as a jurisdictional issue, expressing concerns that Mr Duff lacked standing.
- Applicant: Gordon Duff; respondent: Lisburn and Castlereagh City Council; notice party appeared in person.
- The appeal sought renewed leave to judicially review a reserved matters planning decision.
- The court held the judge was correct to refuse leave on the grounds relied on and adopted Scoffield J’s reasoning.
Why it matters
This is a planning judicial review decision, not a sanctions or national-security case, but it shows how the court polices standing and leave thresholds in public-law challenges. For sovereign-risk or compliance audiences, its practical relevance lies in litigation risk management: courts may scrutinize serial, representative-style challenges and the applicant’s participation history.
case-law
judicial-review
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
UKUT
·
Score 3
From United Kingdom Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
case-law
senior-court
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IECA
·
Score 1
From Irish Court of Appeal
case-law
EU
·
Case
·
Score 1
From European Court of Human Rights
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Decisions
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Jersey
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Jersey Unreported Judgments
case-law
Scotland
·
Case
·
CSOH
·
Score 1
From Scottish Court of Session Decisions
case-law
Scotland
·
Case
·
CSOH
·
Score 1
From Scottish Court of Session Decisions
case-law
Jersey
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Jersey Unreported Judgments
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Jersey
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Jersey Unreported Judgments
case-law
Northern Ireland
·
Case
·
Score 1
From High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland Family Division Decisions
case-law
Scotland
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Scotland Upper Tribunal Decisions
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
EU
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
EAT
·
Score 1
From United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
case-law
Jersey
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Jersey Unreported Judgments
case-law
Jersey
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Jersey Unreported Judgments
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
EU
·
Case
·
Score 1
From European Court of Human Rights
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
Scotland
·
Case
·
Score 1
From Sheriff Appeal Court (Civil) Opinions
case-law
EU
·
Case
·
Score 1
From European Court of Human Rights
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
England & Wales / UK
·
Case
·
Score 1
From First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
case-law
EU
·
Case
·
Score 1
From European Court of Human Rights
case-law
Ireland
·
Case
·
IEHC
·
Score 1
From High Court of Ireland Decisions
case-law